Java: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:28, 29 May 2023 view source Altilunium (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Confirmed users, Administrators 1,854 edits →‎StarSeven ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:29, 29 May 2023 view source Altilunium (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Confirmed users, Administrators 1,854 edits →‎Write once, run everywhere Newer edit →
Line 82:		Line 82:

	Software companies spend a fortune building separate code for Windows NT, Windows 3.1, Linux, MacOS, Solaris, AIX, etc. This is a major headache for every IT shop. Java has achieved the greatest success in letting developers write Java code once for all platforms.\|\|\| Michael Byrne (February 2, 2016) [https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q8n3k/a-brief-history-of-the-java-applet The Rise and Fall of the Java Applet: Creative Coding’s Awkward Little Square] Vice }}		Software companies spend a fortune building separate code for Windows NT, Windows 3.1, Linux, MacOS, Solaris, AIX, etc. This is a major headache for every IT shop. Java has achieved the greatest success in letting developers write Java code once for all platforms.\|\|\| Michael Byrne (February 2, 2016) [https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q8n3k/a-brief-history-of-the-java-applet The Rise and Fall of the Java Applet: Creative Coding’s Awkward Little Square] Vice }}

			== References ==