Luddite: Difference between revisions
→Background
Altilunium (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Background == {{Cquote|Britain had been at war with France since 1793, following the revolution of 1789. The fear amongst the English ruling classes that something similar may occur here was reflected in their attempts to stiffle both political and industrial activity. The Combination Acts of 1799 and 1800 attempted to circumscribe workers' organisations by prohibiting trade unions and collective bargaining. But the effect of this repression was merely to drive act...") |
Altilunium (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7:
In turn, this hit the cotton and woollen industry of the North of England particularly hard and affected the internal market as well. Unemployement rose and allied to the absence of imports, bad harvest in 1810 & 1811 increased the price of food, with the price of corn reaching a peak in 1812 that it never saw for over 100 years. Distress and starvation was all too common.|||The Luddite Bicentenary (March 10, 2011) "[http://ludditebicentenary.blogspot.com/2011/03/broad-context-of-luddism.html The Broad Context of Luddism]"}}
{{Cquote|It was early in the spring of 1811 that the phenomenon of Luddism first manifested itself in the Midlands, and, in particular, Nottinghamshire.
Yet if the popular understanding of Luddism is as a response to labour-saving technology, then what took place in Nottinghamshire does not necessarily provide a good example. In the early nineteenth century, the destruction of machinery was the response to a number of factors which were leading to the exploitation of working-class artisans in the hosiery trade at this time. Unlike some of the other mechanical devices that Luddites in other areas attacked, the mechanical knitting machine ("stocking frame") was not a new device, having been invented over 220 years before by William Lee in the Nottinghamshire village of Calverton in 1589.
The men who worked the machines, stockingers, were skilled artisans. But despite their "artisan" status, in reality stockingers had relatively little autonomy. The trade was controlled by master hosiers, who acted as merchants selling the products produced by the artisans. Some of the hosiers owned factories in the town, but, by and large, hosiery was a domestic system. The stockingers either worked from home in the villages surrounding Nottingham or in the workshops of "small masters". Most of them rented their stocking frame from either the hosier, or independent speculators who had invested in machinery during the boom years.
The early 1800s saw a declining market for hosiery and lace, chiefly influenced by the closing of foreign markets with the introduction of the Orders in Council in 1807. |||The Luddite Bicentenary (March 10, 2011) "[http://ludditebicentenary.blogspot.com/2011/03/nottinghamshire-midlands-in-1811.html Nottinghamshire & The Midlands in 1811]"}}{{Cquote|It was early in the spring of 1811 that the phenomenon of Luddism first manifested itself in the Midlands, and, in particular, Nottinghamshire.
Yet if the popular understanding of Luddism is as a response to labour-saving technology, then what took place in Nottinghamshire does not necessarily provide a good example. In the early nineteenth century, the destruction of machinery was the response to a number of factors which were leading to the exploitation of working-class artisans in the hosiery trade at this time. Unlike some of the other mechanical devices that Luddites in other areas attacked, the mechanical knitting machine ("stocking frame") was not a new device, having been invented over 220 years before by William Lee in the Nottinghamshire village of Calverton in 1589.
The men who worked the machines, stockingers, were skilled artisans. But despite their "artisan" status, in reality stockingers had relatively little autonomy. The trade was controlled by master hosiers, who acted as merchants selling the products produced by the artisans. Some of the hosiers owned factories in the town, but, by and large, hosiery was a domestic system. The stockingers either worked from home in the villages surrounding Nottingham or in the workshops of "small masters". Most of them rented their stocking frame from either the hosier, or independent speculators who had invested in machinery during the boom years.
The early 1800s saw a declining market for hosiery and lace, chiefly influenced by the closing of foreign markets with the introduction of the Orders in Council in 1807. |||The Luddite Bicentenary (March 10, 2011) "[http://ludditebicentenary.blogspot.com/2011/03/nottinghamshire-midlands-in-1811.html Nottinghamshire & The Midlands in 1811]"}}
| |||